photo Contributor1.png

Thursday, December 9, 2010

[REVIEW] ECCI PR100, PR200 and PR300 - Pop and Rock in Trio

First, I’ll like to thank delonicdevil (which is also a seller on eBay) for sending me the samples. ECCI is the brand from the same company that brought us the Storm portable amp and Cyclone IEM a while back. As the business grew, the company decided to up its game with a new name and a new series of products at the end of last year. The original PR series, which were quite popular in Head-fi, was then slowly replaced by a new series of IEM in order to move the production from pure OEM’ed by another company to more of an in-house operation (or so I heard). The results are the PR100, PR200 and PR300 (the latest PR401 has hit the market as well). The name ‘PR’ is short for Pop and Rock – it is what the IEM are intended for: budget oriented products aimed for the mainstream listener.

PR-01.jpg


SPEC
PR-03.jpg
PR100

PR-04.jpg

PR-05.jpg
Two position nozzle

PR-06.jpg
Eartips can fit into different depth

PR100
Driver: 9mm Closed Dynamic
Frequency Response: 20Hz ~ 20kHz
Impedance: 16 ohm at 1kHz
Max Input: 40mW
Sensitivity: 102dB/mW at 1kHz
Cable: 1.4m T.P.E. OFC Y-cord
Gold plated 3.5mm straight plug

PR-08.jpg
PR200

PR-09.jpg

PR200
Driver: 9mm Closed Dynamic
Frequency Response: 20Hz ~ 20kHz
Impedance: 32 ohm at 1kHz
Max Input: 40mW
Sensitivity: 105dB/mW at 3kHz
Cable: 1.4m T.P.E. OFC Y-cord
Gold plated 3.5mm straight plug

PR-11.jpg
PR300

PR-12.jpg

PR300
Driver: 9mm Closed Dynamic
Frequency Response: 20Hz ~ 20kHz
Impedance: 55 ohm at 1kHz
Max Input: 70mW
Sensitivity: 103dB/mW at 1kHz
Cable: 1.4m T.P.E. OFC Y-cord
Gold plated 3.5mm straight plug

Packaging, Accessories and Build Quality
‘Minimalistic’ pretty much describes the packaging of ECCI. This is however not really a weak point – inside the box is a very well made nylon hard case, which will give the protection needed to keep the IEM safe. A good selection of very decent quality eartips is included as well. Two styles of single flanges with three pairs each on different sized, making a total of 6 pair of eartips. A shirt clip is included as well. Build Quality is quite good. The housing is all aluminum alloys, which is a plus. The cable is a little stiff, but of good quality and beautiful to look at. PR300 actually has a softer black cable than the other two – possibly changed from the original silvery grey cable due to some complains about the slight stiffness. PR100 and PR200 look exactly the same except the marking on the font housing; PR300 on the other hand look a bit like a Denon. The two tone colors scheme and the slightly heavy housing make these housings look very classy.

PR-02.jpg

One of the things I really like about the PR100 and PR200 is their double position nozzle. Sam design has been used on Audio Technica ATH-CKS70. Basically the nozzle has two positions where the silicone flange eartips can sit in, so you can get a deeper or shallow eartips position which can be just a little different in sound and fit. Isolation is slightly below average for all three IEM, decent for street use but not enough for very noisy environment. Microphonics is acceptable but nothing to write home about. The inclusion of shirt clip should keep the issue largely at bay and you can wear all three IEM over-the-ears, except that PR300 doesn’t have a cable guide to keep the cable secure so maybe ear hooks will be needed in such configuration. Overall, these IEM look and feel much more expensive than their price tags have suggested.

Sound Quality
As usual, all three IEM received 50 hours or so burn-in before the audition.

PR-07.jpg
PR100

The overall sound signature of PR100 is warm, smooth and easy going to even a little lay back. Bass extends to quite deep in a roll off fashion, but neither abundance nor short in quantity.  It is however good in quality with decent texture and just a tiny but of boominess to give a sense of fullness, but not overdone in anyway. Mid is slightly forward, decently bodied but not overly sweet, just enough to show off detail and gives a mid centric impression without flooding the rest of the spectrum. Treble too extends well but in a roll off fashion, taking a step back from the mid and bass, resulting in micro-detail being really micro, but not totally lacking. Soundstage is a bit below average due to the warm mid.

PR-10.jpg
PR200

The overall sound signature of PR200 is an upgrade over that of PR100, also warm, but with a better sense of balance and excitement. Bass extends the same fashion as PR100, but gone is the slight boominess, smaller in quantity but shows better control in comparison and maintains the same overall impact and texture. Mid is also presented very similar to PR100, slightly forward, decently bodied but not overly sweet, still gives a slightly mid centric impression but better in detail, separation and layering. Similarly, treble extends well in a roll off fashion though more forwarded, showing off micro-detail and sparkles which in term inject just the right amount of liveliness to the sound to give it a better balance in presentation without any major flaw. Soundstage is decent, with nothing to write home about.

PR-13.jpg
PR300

The overall sound signature of PR300 is different from PR100/PR200, and with a leaner, more V-shaped like presentation. Bass is quick, impactful, good in texture, well controlled, larger than that of PR200 though a bit short on decay. Mid is slightly recessed, setting the singer further away and gives a better sense of air. While still in good detail, it lacks the sweetness and intimacy of PR200. Treble is forwarded, full of detail and sparkles while able to keep sibilant away, which is a good thing. Soundstage and image is better than average thanks to better air and micro-detail, though lacks the capability of showing true depth.

Verdict
All three IEM in the PR series have showed to have a good bang of the buck factor for their asking price (PR100 - US$29; PR200 - US$39; PR300 - US$49, cheaper for Singapore local). While PR100 might have a tougher time distinguishing itself over other similarly price IEM, PR200 is a pretty good choice as an entry level option: all-rounded performance with a good build quality and decent accessories at just the right price. Some might find PR200 to be a bit conservative sounding, but as an entry level IEM it will work great as a safe choice for those who have yet to develop or discover their own taste. The PR300 on the other hand is a slight improvement over than of PR200, more refined but also targeting a different demographic of listener who are into a more dynamic and exciting sound. There are plenty of sub $50 IEM in the market these days but ECCI is able to keep true to its goal on offering budget oriented products without scarifying sound or build quality, making it a well worth consideration for those who are hunting for a good deal.

This above rating is for ECCI PR100 only and may change without notice. Please refer to the list for a complete listing.

This above rating is for ECCI PR200 only and may change without notice. Please refer to the list for a complete listing.

This above rating is for ECCI PR300 only and may change without notice. Please refer to the list for a complete listing.  
 

Disclaimer: All trademarks and logos in the website belong to their respective owners. Beside getting free review samples, I don't work for or get paid by anyone to write anything on this website, or anywhere else in that matter. Also, free review samples are never sold for any financial gain. I do buy gears and review them, but for simplicity you (the reader) should always assume what I review is free sample in nature (and thus comes with all the bias). The website does have Google Ads and Amazon Associates enabled (which I have no direct control over their content) - though I don't write review for a living, nor does the ads generates enough money to cover my breakfast (in fact, not even one breakfast per week). Listening to music and playing with audio gears are purely hobby for me. In short, I am just an audiophiles who happens to have his own blog. Not a journalist who happens to be an audiophile. Oh, and excuse my writing as I am not a native English speaker and can't afford a proofreader. Also, just because I don't write in a negative tone doesn't mean I don't write down the negative aspect of a gear. Please read them carefully. Last but not least, please note that this site uses cookies to track visitors' number and page view.

Important: All postings are my own personal opinion only and should not be treated as absolute truth. I do get things wrong just like everyone else. Always do your own research!

Lastest Posts

 
Copyright 2008-2016 In Ear Matters. Powered by Blogger Blogger Templates create by Deluxe Templates. WP by Masterplan