photo Contributor1.png

Monday, July 16, 2012

The Sound Choice - an Illustration of Sonic Relationship

[Click on the picture for full size]

This illustration is by no mean the be-all-end-all of sonic guideline, but it could serve as a quick and easily understandable visual reference for novice to pick a sound signature that is more subjectively preferable (and can be referenced back to my Concise Multi-IEM Comparison) No IEM is perfect, and certainly no IEM can have everything (even though a very few do get close). The idea is to start with one of the six sound signature that is most preferable to you, then look for other traits that could fit into your taste.

For example, if you like a bassy sound, then the two other possible choices besides a purely bass dominating sound are 'balance' and 'warm+sweet', depends on whether you like your bass with more mid or more treble. However, the likelihood that you will enjoy an 'analytical' is probably close to zero. A 'bright vocal' is a long shot as well, but a 'mid centric' sound might be better than none, if you have run out of other choices. 

Some of these sound are naturally the opposite of each others, while other might not be considered as a direct path of upgrade. So it is more likely you will find an agreeable sound on the neighboring signature than those that are on the other sides. For example, you can't have huge soundstage with sweet, fully intimated vocal - they just don't match up that way. Either you are getting one over the other, or they will compensate for each other (and both come up short). These are the relationship that this graph is trying to show you.

No graph has even been able to fully illustrate the complex relationship of sound signature and personal preference, and this graph is no exception. So take it as an interesting opinion, and nothing more. Hopefully it could help you simplify your choice, but never takes it as absolute truth.

Note: Bright Vocal is labeled the 'missing link' because IEM with such a sound is more likely to get categorized as either analytical or mid centric rather than being referred as a sound signature of its own. It is also a rare signature and often not fond by most.

Disclaimer: All trademarks and logos in the website belong to their respective owners. Beside getting free review samples, I don't work for or get paid by anyone to write anything on this website, or anywhere else in that matter. Also, free review samples are never sold for any financial gain. I do buy gears and review them, but for simplicity you (the reader) should always assume what I review is free sample in nature (and thus comes with all the bias). The website does have Google Ads and Amazon Associates enabled (which I have no direct control over their content) - though I don't write review for a living, nor does the ads generates enough money to cover my breakfast (in fact, not even one breakfast per week). Listening to music and playing with audio gears are purely hobby for me. In short, I am just an audiophiles who happens to have his own blog. Not a journalist who happens to be an audiophile. Oh, and excuse my writing as I am not a native English speaker and can't afford a proofreader. Also, just because I don't write in a negative tone doesn't mean I don't write down the negative aspect of a gear. Please read them carefully. Last but not least, please note that this site uses cookies to track visitors' number and page view.

Important: All postings are my own personal opinion only and should not be treated as absolute truth. I do get things wrong just like everyone else. Always do your own research!

Lastest Posts

Copyright 2008-2016 In Ear Matters. Powered by Blogger Blogger Templates create by Deluxe Templates. WP by Masterplan