Wednesday, August 1, 2012

The Sub-$200 Portable Amps Shootout – 12(+10) amps compared

This is basically an extension of the sub-$100 amp shootout I did a while ago as the evaluation and scoring method are essentially the same. As always, this comparison is only a subjective evaluation and nothing more than my own personal opinion.

amp2-00.jpg 



Evaluation Method
Sources: Sansa Fuze via custom LOD (around 0.5Vrms)
IEM used for evaluation: HifiMan RE0, Etymotic ER4S and Shure SE530.
Amps are all in their lowest gain setting. Volume matched using a SPL meter to ≤1dB via white noise and double checked with a multimeter. They are also RMAA tested (loop-out / loop-in though Tone Well UT24 audio interface with a 16ohm load) but only result of significant will be discussed. Output impedance and power are measured using fixed loads and 1kHz tone. The reference amps used for the elevation are Meier Audio StepDance and NwAvGuys’ O2 (built by JDS Labs), both excellent amps of their own.

(Note: it would seem strange that O2 is both the reference amp as well as an amp under review, but this is only because of how good I think it is.)

Criteria
[Build Quality]
Build quality covers not only housing, but also material, design, size, etc – plastic is not necessary rated worst than metal. Functionality is the key here.

[Power]
Current are measured (volume matched driving fixed 47 ohm and 25.5 ohm load, 1kHz pure tone) to multiple with voltage for power.  Most amp have more than enough power for typical IEM, the important point is having enough voltage for high impedance IEM (over 100 ohm) and enough current for low impedance IEM  (under 16 ohm). However, only two typical numbers are covered here.

[Power Drop]
Calculated from the data generated in the Power measurement, this percentage shows how much power is lost when switching from a 47ohm fixed load to a 25.5ohm fixed load. Ideally a lesser power drop indicates a more consistent amp’s performance between different load situations. It also shows the direct negative impact on power delivery caused by higher output impedance. 

[Output Impedance]
Calculated from the voltage difference between no-load and a 47 ohm fixed load with a 1kHz pure tone. Less than 1 ohm is best for most IEM as it has the best dampening and doesn’t affect the FR curve of the IEM. 

[Portability]
Size and weight comparison. Ratings are given as relative. From Biggest (1/5) to smallest (5/5) 

[Speed]
Related to transient. Mainly about the sense of attack - especially noticeable on bass note. 

[Transparency]
Not related to coloration, transparency is used as the sum of the openness and layering of the amp, which are what essential to produce the depth of the sound field 

[Soundstage]
If transparency is the depth, then soundstage is used as the sum of width and separations. Together, they define the overall resolution of the amp. 

[Coloration / Neutrality]
This can be either pure measurement (FR curve) or perceived difference in presentation. O2 will be the main reference here.

[EMI]
Tested using a cellphone receiving call in very close proximity. 

[Hissing]
How well the amp behaves with hiss prone IEM, mainly SE530. 

[Remark]
 Odds and ends that are not covered on above.

Rating
Out of a full mark of 5 points
= 1 point
= ½ point
= Zero point
i.e. ●●●◎○ = 3½ points


Content
Take note the grayed out amps in the list have been previous reviewed in the sub-$100 shootout and are mostly quoted from previous review with updated measurements.
(In alphabetical order)

  1. digiZoid ZO2.3 ($119.95)
  2. FiiO E12 Mont Blanc ($130)
  3. FiiO E17 Alpen ($140)
  4. HeadRoom Total BitHead ($150)
  5. iBasso D-ZERO ($109)
  6. iBasso T3 ($119)
  7. iBasso T5 ($169)
  8. JDS Labs C421 – AD8620 ($189)
  9. JDS Labs C421 – OPA2227 ($184)
  10. JDS Labs Objective 2 ($144)
  11. Lear FSM-01 ($130)
  12. Leckerton Audio UHA-4 ($199)






amp2-03.jpg
digiZoid ZO2.3 (from sub-$100 shootout)
Build Quality: ●●●●● (Beautifully finished, even with a full plastic housing)
Power: ●●●●◎ (Decently powerful)
Power Drop: 6%
Output Impedance:  ●●●●○ (2Ω)
Portability: ●●●●◎ (Ultra-portable)
Speed: ●●●●○ (Decent)
Transparency: ●●●◎○ (slightly forwarded)
Soundstage: ●●●○○ (Not particularly wide)
Coloration / Neutrality: ●●●◎○ (Never quite a flat line, but EQ is its game)
EMI: ●●●◎○ (Easily susceptible)
Hissing: ●●●○○ (Fairly noticeable)
Remark: The bass boosting ZO2.3 isn’t near the best sounding amp in the comparison and yet it is one of the most expensive (top at $99.95 *digiZoid has increased the price to $119.95, making ZO2.3 invalid for the sub$100 comparison). As purely an amp, ZO2.3 has a roll off bass (in Bass Level 0 setting) and doesn’t have quite the resolution compared to those that are cheaper in price. However, ZO2.3 brings something else to the table that will worth your while – the multi-level bass boost, and improved from the original ZO, the ability to take line-out signal. Though it might not be the best sounding or the most powerful amp around, it is great for adding bass to lean sounding IEM. At least for me, I tend to see it as an EQ first and an amp second. It is small so it won’t take much space, and the overall finish is pretty good. The output impedance is a bit high, but any IEM over 16 ohm shouldn’t be a problem at all. However, I won’t use it with IEM of very low impedance (or really high sensitivity) as hissing can become more noticeable.


E12-03.jpg
FiiO E12 Mont Blanc
Build Quality: ●●●●● (Solid)
Power: ●●●●● (Plenty)
Power Drop: -1.5%
Output Impedance:  ●●●●● (0 Ω, too low for measurement)
Portability: ●●○○○ (Full size)
Speed: ●●●●◎ (Sharp and energitic)
Transparency: ●●● (Only decent)
Soundstage: ●● (Mediocre)
Coloration / Neutrality: ●●●● (The narrow soundstage makes everything sounds more forwarded and warmer than it should)
EMI: ●●● (Noticeable and annoying, but not overly loud)
Hissing: ●●●● (Silence in operation, but hiss when recharging)
Remark: E12 is the first FiiO portable amp that can be called a top sounding amp, or at least very close to one - immensely powerful and well controlled but lacks the best transparency and soundstage. The narrower width and depth cause the overall presentation to push forwarded, giving an impression of warmth and energitic sound with a rather musical vocal. However, the forwardness also reduces overall resolution and refinement. Porbably best pair with full size headphone that is either wide in soundstage or more laid back in nature. Sub-bass is a little (-1dB) rolled off near 20Hz, but small enough not to be noticeble. It would have been a great amp if it has the soundstage to match its power, but still a really solid choice for its $130 price tag

amp2-06.jpg
FiiO E17 Alpen
Build Quality: ●●●●● (Solid design with good functionality)
Power: ●●●●● (Plenty)
Power Drop: 3.9%
Output Impedance:  ●●●●● (0.6 Ω)
Portability: ●●○○○ (Full size)
Speed: ●●●●◎ (tiny bit softer in kick but really good overall)
Transparency: ●●●● (decent)
Soundstage: ●●●● (decent)
Coloration / Neutrality: ●●●●◎ (Warmish and slightly forward, but not nothing major to complain about)
EMI: ●●●●● (dead silence)
Hissing: ●●●●● (Very very minor, only detectable in high volume)
Remark: Functionality is the key for E17 Alpen. It isn’t the best sound of the batch but it has the SQ to get the job done. Most importantly, it takes more type of inputs (USB, Coaxial, optical and analog line-in) than any portable amp/DAC that you can find for with a maximum of 24/192 support with a cheaper price tag. Best bang for the bucks is what E17 is all about. For harder to drive headphone, E17 can even dock onto E9 or the newer E09k for higher output. By itself, the performance of the amp section is about the same level as FiiO’s own E11 and iBasso T3. Beside the fact that the DAC section has a very mild, almost inaudible -3dB roll-off over 18kHz (probably due to the DAC’s reconstruction filter), there is very little technical fault on the device itself. It is a well rounded, all purpose multi-tool of a portable amp/DAC. It might be master-of-none, but one can hardly ask for more with the $140 price tag.


amp2-08.jpg
HeadRoom Total BitHead (from sub-$100 shootout)
Build Quality: ●●●●● (Like a tank)
Power: ●●●○○ (Weak, worsen as load impedance goes down)
Power Drop: 9.7%
Output Impedance: ●●◎○○ (5.4Ω)
Portability: ●○○○○ (Larger than typical full size)
Speed: ●●●●◎ (Good speed, though impact is slightly weak)
Transparency: ●●●●○ (Decently deep)
Soundstage: ●●●●◎ (Fairly good)
Coloration / Neutrality: ●●●◎○ (Rolling off at the bassend with a 16ohm load is not a good thing)
EMI: ●○○○○ (Really bad)
Hissing: ●●◎○○ (Rather bad)
Remark: Like PA2V2, the Total AirHead (TA, and TBH in this case) is an old design. For whatever reason, HeadRoom doesn’t seem to want to update the design for the new generation of IEM that are much more efficient and probably trickier to drive. The good news first – 1) TA is the only amp in the comparison with a crossfeed circuit. I have had other portable amps with crossfeed before and the implementation on TA (TBH) is by far the best in creating a very relaxing, natural, binaural-like listening effect. 2) The TA, as well as the Total BitHead (which is what steps in for TA here), is built like a tank. It might be a full plastic + rubber construction, the design is very much foolproof.  The use of 4 AA batteries also means this amp will last almost forever as opposed to the Li-ion battery used on other amps. But it does come with the price of overall portability. 3) Transparency and soundstage are quite good, despite the other problems I’ll mention below.

Now comes the bad news – 1) the high output impedance means any headphone under 40 ohm (following the 8x rule) will not be ideal for the amp. In fact, most of the sensitive multi-driver IEM with crossover circuit will probably sound quite colored. 2) Result of rolloff under 100dB (to -3dB @ 20Hz) with a 16 ohm test load is an indication of too small an output caps. It is not as bad as ZO2.3 in flat EQ mode, but at least ZO2.3 has bass boost to bring back (and excel) the bass. 3) Under RMAA testing, TA’s (and TBH’s) performance worsens with lower impedance load. While it still has more than enough power, it seems to indicate that the amp is having trouble keeping the same performance when impedance is too low. All and all, the result of the tests is pointing toward the conclusion that TA (and TBH) is just not an IEM friendly amp. This won’t be surprising if we consider that there aren’t quite as many IEM users around when the TA (and TBH) was designed. Like PA2V2, it is an outdated design for the current market and is costing too much to be considered a good buy. 4) The USB DAC section in TBH isn’t nearly as nice sounding as many other cheaper options available today. Any other amp/DAC in this shootout will probably make for a much better purchase easily.


amp2-04.jpg
iBasso D-ZERO
Build Quality: ●●●●● (Simplicity and well fabricated)
Power: ●●●●● (Second most powerful)
Power Drop: 1.4%
Output Impedance:  ●●●●● (0.5 3Ω)
Portability: ●●●●○ (Small)
Speed: ●●●●○ (decent speed, slightly slow on attack)
Transparency: ●●●◎○ (A little short in depth)
Soundstage: ●●●●◎ (Good)
Coloration / Neutrality: ●●●●○ (Clean with a fainted sense of warm. Bass rolls off with low impedance load)
EMI: ●●●●◎ (very low but detectable)
Hissing: ●●●●● (dead silence)
Remark:  Intended as the ‘FiiO E7 Killer’, D-zero does offer a better sound than the former.  But that should be expected since it is >$20 more expensive than E7 and offer less features. By itself, D-zero is decently well rounded. Used as USB DAC, it can get slightly brighter but shouldn’t be a big problem as long as it isn’t paired with an already bright sounding headphone. The sub-bass (under 100Hz) however does roll-off with low impedance load (-3.5dB with 16ohm load), indicating that the use of output capacitors with too small of capacitance. It would have been a great amp/DAC choice and a true E7 killer if it is under $100. But given D-ZERO cost up to $125 shipped from iBasso, it is too close to the better sounding and feature-rich E17 ($140 shipped) to have any comfort. As a pure amp, it also doesn’t offer any advantage over its older sibling, the T3 or the cheaper FiiO E11. As an USB DAC however, D-ZERO offers a good, clean sound, which is where D-ZERO’s true value is, especially since the line-in also double as a line-out when D-ZERO is used as USB DAC. Overall, the asking price put D-ZERO in an awkward place where is it a bit too expensive to compared to the cheaper stuff yet it is not good enough to compare to the more expensive stuff. Even so, it still makes Total BitHead looks totally over-priced and out-dated.

amp2-01.jpg
iBasso T3
Build Quality: ●●●●○ (Decent but can be better)
Power: ●●●●● (Most powerful)
Power Drop: 0%
Output Impedance:  ●●●●● (0.5 Ω)
Portability: ●●●●◎ (Ultra-portable)
Speed: ●●●●◎ (Good, missing just a tiny bit of the deep kick)
Transparency: ●●●●◎ (Good)
Soundstage: ●●●● (decent)
Coloration / Neutrality: ●●●●◎ (Mostly neutral with slight brightness and a sense of leanness)
EMI: ●●●●◎ (very low but detectable)
Hissing: ●●●●◎ (Very minor, almost inaudible))
Remark:  One of the slimmest of the batch yet offers really solid power (in fact, highest into a 47ohm load used in testing and most consistent into a 25.5ohm load). T3 can sound a bit lean and sterile for those who are looking to add weight and body to their music by amping, but technically it is still very good. As an ultra-portable, there is really not much to complain about with such a good performance.


amp2-02.jpg
iBasso T5
Build Quality: ●●●○○ (slight disappointment)
Power: ●●●●◎ (Decently powerful)
Power Drop: 8.7%
Output Impedance:  ●●●●○ (2.7 Ω)
Portability: ●●●●◎ (Ultra-portable)
Speed: ●●●● (Softer edge seems to be a balanced ground specialty)
Transparency: ●●●●● (well rendering of depth)
Soundstage: ●●●● (Decent, but still a little short in width)
Coloration / Neutrality: ●●●●◎ (Mostly neutral with a unique smoothness of balanced ground)
EMI: ●●●●● (dead silence)
Hissing: ●●●●◎ (Very minor, almost inaudible)
Remark: T5 is supposed to be the better T3 – in some way it is, but in other ways it isn’t. On the plus side, T5 has BTL ground, a type of active balanced ground similar to that used on many Meier Audio’s amp. It gives benefit of a balanced setup without the need to recable your headphone. It isn’t as good sounding as Meier Audio StepDance, but iBasso has done a great job on packing such a complex implementation into such a tiny package while still maintain a really good SQ. While it might not have the highest output to the 47ohm test load, it can still get really loud with good power into more difficult load. It would have been the perfect ultra-portable if not for some major flaws.

Now on the bad side of things – the build quality of T5 is rather mediocre. First, the rubber coating around the zinc alloy frame chipped almost as soon as I start using it. Second, the battery ballooned up and failed within a short few months. Third, the amp has really loud click-and-pop during startup and shutdown. Lastly, for an ultra-portable designed mainly for IEM, the output impedance is slightly on the higher side. As my fourth iBasso’s amps, T5 also has the worst build quality of them all. I wonder if iBasso’s intension to pack everything into such a small package has ended up costing them to cut corner in build quality. Without saying, I am disappointed.

[Update 28 Sept. 2013] iBasso has responded to user's email that T5 is unable to recharge and operate at the same time, despite failing to mention such a crucial information on its website or in the manual. It is also a much further issue that some T5 owner had reported that they T5 can be used when recharged, while a few also reported battery failure. For these questionable build quality issues, I strongly advise against buying a T5.

amp2-10.jpg
JDS Labs C421 – AD8620
Build Quality: ●●●●◎ (Very good)
Power: ●●◎○○ (Weakest of the batch)
Power Drop: 21%
Output Impedance:  ●◎○○○ (10.7 Ω)
Portability: ●●○○○ (Full size)
Speed: ●●●●● (Almost as good as O2)
Transparency: ●●●●● (Will give it half a mark more if I can)
Soundstage: ●●●●◎ (Good)
Coloration / Neutrality: ●●●●● (Almost as good as O2, almost)
EMI: ●●●●● (dead silence)
Hissing: ●●●●● (dead silence)
Remark: C421 with AD8620 is by far the best sounding amp after O2 in the batch. Sonically there is nothing bad to speak of – clean, neutral, well balanced and specious. It goes particularly well with IEM, especially Etymotic ER4S, as it can render depth in the most spectacular way. The JDS signature bass boost also helps a lot. Measurement wise, it is almost flawless as well – except in one particular area, the high output impedance, which also makes it to have the worst power delivery into a low impedance load of all the amps in review. It still has enough, but obviously it could have been a lot better. High output impedance generally give two problems: first, low electronic dampening. Second, coloration to the headphone. The good news is, coloration doesn’t seem to be a problem for C421 as it still measured perfectly flat with low impedance IEM. Of course, you still won’t get much dampening out of it. Without the high output impedance, this would have been the best $200 amp around, both sonically and technically.


amp2-10.jpg
JDS Labs C421 – OPA2227
Build Quality: ●●●●◎ (Very good)
Power: ●●◎○○ (Weakest of the batch)
Power Drop: 21%
Output Impedance:  ●◎○○○ (10.8 Ω)
Portability: ●●○○○ (Full size)
Speed: ●●●●● (Almost as good as O2)
Transparency: ●●●● (decent)
Soundstage: ●●●●◎ (Really good, but lack a sense of openness)
Coloration / Neutrality: ●●●●◎ (Really good, but slightly forwarded)
EMI: ●●●●● (dead silence)
Hissing: ●●●●● (dead silence)
Remark: C421 with OPA2227 shares almost all the good and bad of C421-AD8620. Afterall, the two are the same except for the opamp. In comparison, OPA2227 offers a richer, more upfront presentation over the higher resolution on sonic space of AD8620. Musicality over precision, if you like. Beyond  that, C421 with OPA2227 is still a very capable amp.


amp2-09.jpg
JDS Labs Objective 2
Build Quality: ●●●●◎ (Very good)
Power: ●●●●● (Plenty)
Power Drop: 0.6%
Output Impedance:  ●●●●◎ (1.1 Ω)
Portability: ○○○○ (More transportable than portable)
Speed: ●●●●● (reference)
Transparency: ●●●●● (reference)
Soundstage: ●●●●● (reference)
Coloration / Neutrality: ●●●●● (Perfectly colorless)
EMI: ●●●●◎ (very low but detectable)
Hissing: ●●●●● (dead silence)
Remark: Designed via measurement, O2 is the reference amp of the whole shootout and offers the best SQ subjectively and objectively. It has the best blend of everything, as far as sound being the only concern. But as an amp designed solely to achieve maximum SQ, the practicality side of the amp does suffered a bit. First, the size and weight are closer to a transportable rather than a portable amp. Second, the use of non-standard power supply / charger makes it much less viable as a traveler choice. In fact, it is the only other amp besides Total BitHead (which isn’t rechargeable anyway) that doesn’t take an USB connection for power / recharge. The less-than-easily accessible batteries compartment also means that, even when using regular non-rechargeable 9V when travelling, you still need to carry a screw driver around. Overall, O2 is more like a desktop amp that can go mobile, rather than a truly portable amp in spirit.



amp2-05.jpg
Lear FSM-01
Build Quality: ●●●●○ (Decent but can be better)
Power: ●●●●◎ (Decently powerful)
Power Drop: 4.2%
Output Impedance:  ●●●●● (0.55Ω)
Portability: ●●○○ (Almost full size)
Speed: ●●●◎○ (Not bad, but does feel a little slower than it should)
Transparency:  ●●●●◎ (Good depth rendering)
Soundstage: ●●●◎○ (Not bad, but not particularly wide too)
Coloration / Neutrality: ●●●●◎ (Very clean on the slightly leaner sounding side)
EMI: ●○○○○ (Really bad)
Hissing: ●●◎○○ (Rather bad, worsen with higher gain)
Remark: FSM-01 is a good sounding amp with some problem of its own. Before O2, this would have been one of the most transparent amps under $150. The main issues with FSM-01 are the high level of hiss and non-resistant to EMI, which makes it a less practical option these days when many use smartphone as source. With O2 only costing less than $15 more, FSM-01 just doesn’t seem that attractive anymore.


amp2-07.jpg
Leckerton Audio UHA-4 with OPA209
Build Quality: ●●●●● (Excellent)
Power: ●●●●● (Plenty)
Power Drop: 1.6%
Output Impedance:  ●●●●● (0.1 Ω)
Portability: ●●●● (Slim but wide)
Speed: ●●●●● (Excellent)
Transparency: ●●●●◎ (Good)
Soundstage: ●●●●◎ (Good)
Coloration / Neutrality: ●●●●● (Really neutral, somewhere between the two C421)
EMI: ●●●● (Low)

Hissing: ●●●●● (dead silence)
Remark: UHA-4 with OPA209 is the most expensive amp of the batch (and in fact cost over $200 when shipping is included) but also has the best balance between subjective sound, objective measurement as well as real world practicality. Sonic wise, it is a close blend between C421-AD8620 and C421-OPA2227, with some of the detail and resolution of the former and the richness of the later while still remains mostly neutral and transparent. I still prefer C421-AD8620 over UHA-4 but it is a really close call. The only part of UHA-4 that doesn’t sound quite as perfect is its overall resolution and rendering of space. It is really good, but not great. Measurement wise, UHA-4 is almost as good as O2 in every area. Size and weight wise, UHA-4 is slim and easy to carry around. The USB DAC itself is really good as well. Not ObjectDAC level but definitely gives E17 a good run for its money even though it is just a good old 16/44.1 USB DAC. Oh, there is also a crossfeed if you need it. In many ways, UHA-4 reminds me of my trusty Meier Audio 3MOVE, but in a much smaller package. If you must spend $200 for an amp/DAC with the best combination of sound quality and functionality, this will be the one to get.



[Ranking]

  1. JDS Labs Objective 2
  2. JDS Labs C421-AD8620 / Leckerton Audio UHA-4(OPA209)
  3. JDS Labs C421-OPA2227 / FiiO E12 Mont Blanc
  4. iBasso T5
  5. Lear FSM-01 / Fred_fred_2004’s 3 Channels Headphone Amp
  6. FiiO E17 Alpen / iBasso T3 / FiiO E11
  7. iBasso D-ZERO / JDS Labs cmoyBB v2.02
  8. digZoid ZO2.3 / Electric Avenues PA2V2 / FiiO E07K
  9. FiiO E6 / FiiO E02i
  10. FiiO E7 / SoundMAGIC A10
  11. HeadRoom Total BitHead / HeadRoom Total AirHead

Note: Sub-$100 amps are included but grayed out.


[Afterthought]
  1. Again, amps are all volume matched using a SPL meter during the review.
  2. No amp is perfect. Best sounding amp doesn’t equal to the most practical amp. You’ll need to decide what feature is most important to you and go from there.
  3. Big thanks to JDS Labs for the C421-OPA2227 loan unit.

...Continue to read the Sub-$100 Amps Shootout here.

38 comments:

Hysticali said...

Thanks for the reviews, I think the Objective2 is a great amp.

Tai / ClieOS said...

Indeed it is.

Chris Wen said...

Hi ClieOS,
Thank you for your great review! I have finally decided to order an UHA-4 and I am waiting for Nick to ship it. C421 is attractive but I do need something that can work with low impedance. Thanks again for your suggestions.

IndieS said...

Hai Tai, wonder if you ever tried IBasso P4? kinda cant decide if should buy P4 or C421.

Tai / ClieOS said...

No. My experience with iBasso limits to mostly their T series.

RisingTide said...

Quality and comprehensive review, awesome work again from ClieOS. I have a question about the O2 amp, how do you charge the unit from a wall socket in the Asian region (like Malaysia?) which is rated 240V 50Hz, unlike the US which is 110V 60Hz? JDS doesn't supply a charger along with the O2 too.

Tai / ClieOS said...

You'll need to buy an compatible AC/AC adapter. I got mine from Farnell / Element14 (http://my.element14.com), order code: 1176241. JDS does sell a charger for O2, but it is 110V only.

RisingTide said...

Thanks, I'm thinking of pairing this amp with my DT770pro 250ohm, what do you think? Is it a good pairing? Or perhaps you know of something better?

Tai / ClieOS said...

Technically I don't think O2 has any problem driving DT770Pro 250ohm. But how they will sound is beyond me since I have not heard DT770Pro myself. Then again, O2 is an incredibly transparent amp so I don't think you will find synergy an issue at all.

ChocoBozz said...

Hi again Tai,

This time i wanted to ask you if you use your Sansa Fuze with LOD with the original firmware, or if you discover the way to make it work with Rockbox. I ask you this because i have a Fuze+Audio Minor LOD+ T5 . Normally i don't use the EQ (With my RE272), so i haven't any problems with the original firmware, but when i want to do it, i remember how bad the original firmware it is in that fuction.

Best regards!

Tai / ClieOS said...

I have tried RockBox on my Fuze. To be frank, I didn't find it to sound better, but it does offer more functions. The extra features don't appeal to my need and eventually I uninstalled it.

As far as review goes, they are all done on the original firmware. Now there are actually two version of Fuze, V1 and V2. Rockbox for V1 does support LO without any problem. Rockbox for V2 doesn't support it natively (AFAIK), and will require a custom patch to enable the function. My Fuze is a V1, so I have no problem with LO with either stock firmware or RB.

ChocoBozz said...

I have the V2, and i really like how the LOD complements the setup, but i'm really tired about the glitches, so i'm going to sell it. By the way, are you going to release soon the Rock It Sounds reviews? i bought all the models and i'm really nervous, but i think that by the end of the week i will know if they worth the price.

Best regards from Chile!

Tai / ClieOS said...

Review for RockIt Sound is still a little far away. As you can see on the 'preview for review', there are quite a few IEM waiting for review and I am trying to do it as quickly as possible without rushing through the process.

MelonPan said...

Great comparison! This shootout really helped as it's the only review I know of that compares hiss and EMI between various portable amps.

Quick question though, I'm considering the UHA-4 but I noticed that you rated its EMI at "only" 4 points. I've had experiences where taking the subway or bus causes loud EMI noises because of my amp and I really can't stand the constant buzzing when near some electronics.

Does the UHA-4 face such problems? Will sacrificing SQ and getting the E17 or C421 be a better choice? And help on this is greatly appreciated :)

PS:I will mostly be using it with my se535LTD while on the move.

Tai / ClieOS said...

4 points on EMI means s very light noise, barely audible situation. It should still be very useable in real world where EMI isn't the biggest noise around. But that being said, using smartphone as source (or even very near one), though as popular as they are, is generally a bad idea as far as EMI is concerned. Unfortunately different cellphone and electronics device can have varying degree of EMI issue and even something like E17 or C421 can still get interference sometime. It is just unavoidable for the modern lifestyle where people's pockets and bags are stuffed full of electronics.

Given you are using SE535LTD, I think getting the UHA-4 will be the right choice, as it behaves very well with IEM.

Anonymous said...

Hi clieos, how does the o2 compare with the stepdance?

Tai / ClieOS said...

I consider them on par of each other.

Anonymous said...

How does the bass boost on the E17 compare to that of the ZO2 in terms of both quantity and quality?

Tai / ClieOS said...

Quantitative wise, both will give you around 12dB of bass boost. As an amp, E17 is better. For level of control, ZO2.3 offers up to 32 step while E17 only has 5. If it is only bass boost you want and you are not using very sensitive IEM, ZO2.3 will do the job well enough. But beyond that, E17 might be better.

Anonymous said...

FYI - Per the designer's measurements, the Output Impedance of the O2 is 0.54 Ohms:
http://nwavguy.blogspot.com/2011/07/o2-headphone-amp.html

Tai / ClieOS said...

FYI, I know what NwAvGuy had posted just fine - but per my measurement, it is what listed above.

Anonymous said...

Wasn't trying to step on any toes or offend anyone, just sharing alternative measurements. I wasn't sure if that was a typo or if you had measured it yourself. It doesn't matter I guess as the O2 came out on top anyways.

Anonymous said...

Hi,
Just found your article and read with great interest.
Could you shed me some light? Based on your detailed analysis, how could T5 be ranked above E17 ans T3? Do you weight the transparency higher than other parameters?

Thanks

Tai / ClieOS said...

Note that the transparency referred in the review is not the normal meaning of sounding 'transparent' or lack of coloration, but a description of having a transparent depth in background - however, you are correct to assume that tranparency, or the lack of coloration plays a major part in how the ranking is determined. The ultimate goal of an amp is usually being refered as 'wire with gain', so it should be as transparent as possible. That's why O2, being the most transparent sounding of all the amps, is beign used as the reference for others to compare to.

Anonymous said...

Hi,
Really appreciated your clarification. Will keep following your quality works.

Cheers,

Anonymous said...

Hi Tai.
How's about the new FiiO E12 vs the Ibasso T5? Which is the winner in overall sound, and which is more neutral, less disortion, and worthier to buy?
Thank you.

Tai / ClieOS said...

E12 without a doubt.

Anonymous said...

Hello Clieos.
E12 versus Corda3move, only the amp part, which is winner? Thank you.

Tai / ClieOS said...

E12 is the overall winner. 3MOVE is never a bad amp to begin with, but E12 can put out a lot more power when needed.

Anonymous said...

hi Tai, does the E12 can match the O2 in neutral, I dun care about the size, just wanna choose the better headamp, so could ya please suggest to me, thank you. And do ya think the IC is the most important part of a gear, or just a little bit inflence, and It's wasting money to invest an expensive IC?

Tai / ClieOS said...

IC, while important, isn't the most important things to an amp. A good circuit design is arguably more important. A lesser opamp with a good topology can outperform an expensive opamp with lesser design.

To cut it short, if you are not planning to drive a >300ohm headphones, I'll suggest the O2 first. The detail will be covered in the upcoming E12 review.

Anonymous said...

ok, thank you so much.And waiting for your FiiO E12 review.

Michael Gunin said...

Hello Tai,

Thanks for the review. I have a low-oHm Sony MDR-MA900 (12 oHm) and I wonder which amp is best for them?

Thanks in advance,
Michael

Tai / ClieOS said...

Any amp that has a low output impedance (under 1 ohm) should suffice. Actually, if MA900 impedance phase isn't really curvy or weird, even high output impedance amp can still do the job well enough. In this case, I think it is more of a matter of what budget you have in mind, and whether you need it to be very portable or not. If the later isn't an issue, just get the O2 and it should drive you headphone very well.

hifi guy said...

Hey Tai i'm looking for a great portable amp for the HD 650 and the new JDS labs C5 looks good, but I was wondering about power. Know anything??

Tai / ClieOS said...

C5 should have no problem driving the HD650, judging on spec. I can't tell you how good the pairing will be as I don't own a HD650.

hifi guy said...

Okay thank you so much, would you happen to know any good pairings with ample power to drive the 650's by chance? and the C5 is supossed to be a little O2 but it's ever slightly forward in comparison but still open and transparent.

Tai / ClieOS said...

I don't know. Never own a HD650 before so I can't comment on how it will sound with any amp.

Post a Comment

Amazon's Deal

Disclaimer: All trademarks and logos in the website belong to their respective owners. Beside getting free review samples, I don't work for or get paid by anyone to write anything on this website, or anywhere else in that matter. Also, free review samples are never sold for any financial gain. I do buy gears and review them, but for simplicity you (the reader) should always assume what I review is free sample in nature (and thus comes with all the bias). The website does have Google Ads and Amazon Associates enabled (which I have no direct control over their content) - though I don't write review for a living, nor does the ads generates enough money to cover my breakfast (in fact, not even one breakfast per week). Listening to music and playing with audio gears are purely hobby for me. In short, I am just an audiophiles who happens to have his own blog. Not a journalist who happens to be an audiophile. Oh, and excuse my writing as I am not a native English speaker and can't afford a proofreader. Also, just because I don't write in a negative tone doesn't mean I don't write down the negative aspect of a gear. Please read them carefully.

Important: All postings are my own personal opinion only and should not be treated as absolute truth. I do get things wrong just like everyone else. Always do your own research!

Lastest Posts

Latest Comments

 
Copyright 2008-2014 In Ear Matters. Powered by Blogger Blogger Templates create by Deluxe Templates. WP by Masterplan