Tuesday, December 15, 2009

[REVIEW] Ortofon e-Q7

Before the review, I want to thank Ortofon Japan for loaning a pair of e-Q7 to me.

Driver: Single Balanced Armature
Frequency Response: 10Hz – 20kHz (+/- 3dB)
Sensitivity: 120dB SPL/mW
Impedance: 40 ohms
Maximum Rated Input Power: 5.0mW
Weight: 16.9g
Cable: 1.2m, Silver Plated 4N OFC.

Technical Prelude
When Ortofon first announced the e-Q7, the earphone is advertised as having a newly developed single magnetic pole, armature based large size transducer. In most other balanced armature (BA) transducer, the ‘arm’ where the miniature coil is resting on is placed between two magnets (this is the ‘balanced armature’ part). When electrical signal is applied the coil, the arm flexes back and forth according to the change of magnetic field and push an rod at the end of the arm. The rod transmits the motion to the miniature diaphragm and creates the sound. In contrast to BA, dynamic (moving coil) transducer’s coil is placed inside a single larger magnetic field (a rounded magnet). The motion of the coil is directly transmitted to the diaphragm since they are attached to each other. The different in construction reflects the differences in sonic characteristic: BA is often better at detail, speed and resolution, while dynamic is often better at mass and low frequency performance.

The new armature transducer in e-Q7 is, however, a different beast. If I have to sum it up in one word, I’ll call it a ‘hybrid’, or perhaps Grado has described it in a better term as “moving armature” (on their GR8, which features the same family of transducer). Imagine a dynamic transducer without the moving coil. Instead, the diaphragm is connected to a large armature placed in a single large magnetic field. Now you’ll have the best of both world – speed and resolution of balanced armature with the massive low-end found on dynamic transducer. Too good to be true? Perhaps not.

After over 20 years of trying to improve on old technologies in the field of IEM design, now we finally enter in a new era, with a new type of transducer.

A very detailed user manual (with both Japanese and English) is included. Only a small handful of IEM makers have well printed manual. A real shame actually.

Packaging, Accessories, and Build Quality
I am not sure whether it is because the e-Q7 is from Ortofon, or maybe because it is made in Japan (likely the combination of both), the packaging is just great. It just so happens that out of top three IEM packaging I have ever seen (Shure SE530, Sony MDR-EX700 and Ortofon e-Q7), two of them share the same Japanese origin.

Inside the box, you’ll find a hard paper box with velvet lining inside (the sort of box jeweler will use). Open the hard paper box up, the shiny metal ‘ortofon’ is almost too pretty to look at. The IEM itself is sitting at the bottom, just below the real leather hard case. It is elegant.

The other accessories are, three pair of eartips (S, M, L), 3 pairs of replacement filters, a filter removing tool, a pair of replacement filter locking rings, a pair of mid size Comply T400 foam tip. The nozzle size is that of typical UE style, which means finding after market eartips shouldn’t be a problem at all – not that you will need them as I find the included eartips to be soft and comfy, but isolation is slightly below average.

This is real leather case.

The earpieces are made out of aluminum, with an elongated design to serve as an acoustic chamber. Due to the length and weight, the earpiece will tend to lose its seal from time to time, especially if you wear it in hanging style and move a lot. However, it really doesn’t happen often enough to reach the level of annoyance. You can also wear it over-the-ear to avoid the issue once and for all.

The strain relief on the earpiece is semi-hard rubber, which retains a small degree of plasticity but it doesn’t flex much. The cable is ultra pure silver plated OFC. Interestingly, the cable has a two parts design. For the earpieces to the Y-splitter, it is your typical rubber wrapped wire. But from Y-splitter downward, it has an extra fabric sheath to reduce microphonics (and a side effect of extra rigidity). The design actually works really well. If there is one part I don’t like about the cable, it will be the strain relief on the mini plug. It is quite hard and doesn’t do much to relief stress. Unfortunately Ortofon doesn’t include a wire guide up from the Y-splitter, so there is nothing to hold the cable firmly if you want to wear the e-Q7 over-the-ear. The good news is the upper portion of the cable (without the fabric) is soft enough that you don’t need a wire guide to make the cable stays in place. But I would imagine a wire guide could be even better.

In sum, e-Q7 build quality is top notch, but there are still some minor areas that can be improved upon.

There is not obvious left and right marking, but there is an extra bump / dot on the left strain relief.

The two parts cable design, with fabric sheath on the lower end.

The filter is hold by a plastic ring.

Sound Quality
As always, the e-Q7 has been given a 50hrs+ burn-in before the review. Self-contained BA transducer often does not benefit much from the housing, as everything is sealed inside a tiny metal case. On the other hand, dynamic transducer is easily affected by both the design and material of the housing, which give more ‘tuning space’. Since the diaphragm of the e-Q7’s armature transducer has a closer resemblance to that of a dynamic transducer, an elongated housing is designed to be the acoustic chamber to help deepening the mid and bass body.

The overall sound signature is warm and mid focus, well suited for vocal lover. Treble is clean and smooth, though does roll off on the top end, but not more so than SE530 or UM2. Mid is full, focus and sweet, but not overpowering nor sibilant. Bass has good impact, body and extension, but no rumbling big bass. Soundstage is only average.

In many ways e-Q7 sounds like the midway of SE530 and UM2. It has a better mid performance than SE530 as it is totally sibilance-free yet retains most of the mid goodness of SE530 (which still has a tiny bit of sibilance), but it is not quite warm as UM2 (which is probably too warm from a neutral prospective). It also does not have quite as good a soundstage as SE530 because it doesn’t separate each layer as cleanly, yet it is still better than UM2.

What surprised me most are how much e-Q7 sounds like a dynamic transducer based IEM, yet has speed and resolution closer to that of a BA based IEM. One interesting thing to note is, like most dynamic transducer based IEM, e-Q7 needs a bit more volume to sound as its best – but remember not to crank the volume too high.

Ortofon e-Q7 is by far the best single BA based IEM I have ever heard, placing it alongside with some of the best multi-ways universal IEM in the market. This proves again that more transducer is not the only answer to the question of better sound quality, even in the world of balanced armature.

Multi-ways IEM beware: This is only just the beginning. With e-Q7 doing so well, I would imagine the future generation of this new BA will be even better.

Ortofon e-Q7 can be acquired in Japan for about ¥24100 (roughly US$270) from reputable dealer, but unfortunately international price is often higher.

Last but not least, a pictorial comparison between e-Q7 and TF10 (with shure olive).

A quick sum up can be found here.


DJdonat said...

hey - have you listened to the grado gr8? - does the ortofon have the same driver?

Tai / ClieOS said...

No, GR8 and e-Q7 do not share the same driver and do not sound the same. They do share 'the same family' of driver made by the same Japanese company, which has been confirmed by a Japanese website under direct comparison.

I have yet to listen to GR8, and so far have no plan on reviewing it.

Anonymous said...

Does the nozzle fit shure olives?

Tai / ClieOS said...

No, it won't fit olive without modification.

It will fit Comply T400 and Sony Hybrid silicone eartips though.

Anonymous said...

How comfortable is this IEM? Can you listen to hours on end?
Does it stick out when you wear them? It looks pretty big.


Tai / ClieOS said...

Fit on the stock eartips is good, I do use my e-Q7 for hours on end. It does stick out by a little bit, but I don't feel the elongated body to be annoying. Obviously it is not suitable for running. You can wear them over-the-ear which should give a more secured fit.

Anonymous said...

What sort of mod would I need to do to make the olives fit?

I'm worried about using Comply since I heard that you go through a set every 2 weeks.

Anonymous said...

or do you recommend the Sony hybrids?

Thanks in advance!

Tai / ClieOS said...

I think you should give the stock eartips a try first. I personally find them comfortable to use.

For olive, you should de-core (remove the inner transparent tube) with a pointy knife or your finger nail, but be sure not to dame the foam. Then you can glue the black foam to tube of the stock T400 (obviously you should use it first. This way you'll get an olive that fit the e-Q7.

Sony hybrid is easy alternative of the stock eartips and it has a better grip, but it is $10 or so on 4 pair of different sizes.

tonti said...

would you happen to know if this is the same e-q7 they're selling in amazon japan? it says e-q7-k for the black version.

Tai / ClieOS said...

Yes, all three colors (red, black and silver) of e-Q7 are the same.

Noir said...

just want to know your opinion about this, have you heard of ultrasone HFI780? once i've heard it and love the impact (hard to describe, its like drum or instrument that sound "tek..tek.." really make it presence and impact).
is there any IEM that sound impact full like those? i owned phonak, eterna and neither of those are having those impact despite loving the clarity of phonak.
since i'm quite interested in this e-Q7.

Tai / ClieOS said...

Unfortunately I haven't heard ultrasone HFI780 before, so I can't reallt tell you how it compares. However, if it is any help, e-Q7 do have bigger bass than PFE, and probably the best among any single BA based IEM and even compared well to many multi-ways IEM.

Noir said...

thanks for your input, just one more question it doesn't related to this topic though i hope its ok to post it.
how about if i want those phonak sparkle high but with the goodness of multiple driver? is there any IEM that resemble it?

Tai / ClieOS said...

The most similar in sound signature (of which I know) will be TF10, though the truth is it will not be a major upgrade because PFE is really that good. Another good candidate will be DBA-02. It is not totally like PFE as it is more aggressive in detail but like PFE it has a great price point. Other than these two, perhaps Audio Technica flagship models might fit as well but I have yet listen to them.

Noir said...

thanks again, i believe about that major upgrade thing since i've already heard the UM3X which in my ears quite resemble the eterna but without all the goodness of multiple BA so i don't think it will be a major upgrade.
based on your input the e-Q7 will not be in my list since i like the high on phonak, maybe i'll try the DBA-02...

Rahul S said...


I am considering an e-q7 as my next IEM.

I used to own an e4c however the cable broke apart after 2 years of use.

My only worry is , will the cables ( connecting the earphone soldering) be able to last long for me. I am kind of a rough handeler of things.

Tai / ClieOS said...

Obviously this depends a lot on how you handle the IEM. If you do consider yourself to be a bit rough on things, I would suggest IEM with replaceable cable (SE535, UM3X). This is not to say e-Q7's cable is weak. On the country, it is very well build and can take some abuse. But it is not bulletproof and won't last forever.

Anonymous said...

i see that these IEM's have a very high sensitivity what does that mean and what effect does it have?

Tai / ClieOS said...

You need to look at the whole picture - the sensitivity, impedance, power rating, etc. For high sensitivity, it means less volume on the source to achieve the same loudness. But since the impedance is just a little higher, it will balance the high sensitivity out. Al you really need to know is the e-Q7 is relatively easy to drive and not overly sensitive (or other wise).

Post a Comment

Amazon's Deal

Disclaimer: All trademarks and logos in the website belong to their respective owners. Beside getting free review samples, I don't work for or get paid by anyone to write anything on this website, or anywhere else in that matter. Also, free review samples are never sold for any financial gain. I do buy gears and review them, but for simplicity you (the reader) should always assume what I review is free sample in nature (and thus comes with all the bias). The website does have Google Ads and Amazon Associates enabled (which I have no direct control over their content) - though I don't write review for a living, nor does the ads generates enough money to cover my breakfast (in fact, not even one breakfast per week). Listening to music and playing with audio gears are purely hobby for me. In short, I am just an audiophiles who happens to have his own blog. Not a journalist who happens to be an audiophile. Oh, and excuse my writing as I am not a native English speaker and can't afford a proofreader. Also, just because I don't write in a negative tone doesn't mean I don't write down the negative aspect of a gear. Please read them carefully.

Important: All postings are my own personal opinion only and should not be treated as absolute truth. I do get things wrong just like everyone else. Always do your own research!

Lastest Posts

Latest Comments

Copyright 2008-2014 In Ear Matters. Powered by Blogger Blogger Templates create by Deluxe Templates. WP by Masterplan